STM Article Repository

In SM a particle is represented as a point that is the source of a field, but cannot be reduced to the field itself and nothing can be said about its “structure” except with these vague words. In the standard quantum theory, a micro particle is described with the help of a wave function with a probabilistic interpretation. The particle is represented by the wave packet in nonlinear space‐time continuum. Due of dispersion, the packet periodically appears and disappears in movement and the envelope of the process coincides with the wave function. It was considered that the partial differential equation of telegraph‐type describes the motion of such wave packet in spherical coordinate space . Also the analytical solution of this equation was constructed and it was supposed that the integral over all space of |grad| was equal to the mass of the particle identified with the wave packet. As the solution depends on two parameters being positive integer, it is possible to calculate our theoretical particle masses for different , . Thus, we have obtained the theoretical mass spectrum of elementary particles. In comparison with known experimental mass spectrum it shows that our calculated theoretical mass spectrum is sufficiently verisimilar. In this article we discuss the problems of standard SM‐model, supersymmetry and string theory, compare the possibility to predict in UQT and SM and show that Standard Model has left unsettled alot of fundamental problems solved by UQT. The authors realize in full the panic their investigations can create among scientists working in the field of high energy physics. And of course the position of modern science is quite evident: to keep the financing of future projects the UQT should not be noticed at all.