Nweke, Ogochukwu C. and Agbenyega, Samuel N. K. and Apuko, Peter Awuni (2024) Jurisdiction and Its Ramifications in Ghanaian Arbitration Proceedings. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 12 (01). pp. 1-19. ISSN 2327-5952
jss_2024010514574816.pdf - Published Version
Download (304kB)
Abstract
Jurisdiction, defined as the legal capacity of a judicial body to adjudicate a matter, is crucial. Even the most solid of cases may be rendered a nullity if presented before a forum lacking the appropriate jurisdiction. In the Republic of Ghana, the adoption of arbitration as an alternative to the traditional dispute resolution mechanisms hinges on various types of jurisdiction: personal, subject matter, or forum-based; as well as on the arbitrability of the matter and competence of the tribunal. Locus standi forms the foundation for both disputing parties and the tribunal in processing, adjudicating, and issuing valid and enforceable arbitral awards. Such awards must be recognisable and enforceable by a competent national court, specifically the high court in Ghana’s context.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | GO for ARCHIVE > Multidisciplinary |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email support@goforarchive.com |
Date Deposited: | 08 Jan 2024 13:01 |
Last Modified: | 08 Jan 2024 13:01 |
URI: | http://eprints.go4mailburst.com/id/eprint/2076 |